Question 1: Does the term denote a defined person or meaning, or include an entire class?
Question 2: If it is general, has any valid proof excluded a subset?
Question 3: If a specific legal implication meets other evidence, can the texts be reconciled? If not, which governing principle determines preference or specification?
Question 4: Is the disagreement about what a term means, whether evidence is established, or what subsidiary ruling follows?
A reliable analysis keeps expression, proof, apparent conflict and legal result distinct instead of merely memorizing the eventual opinion.