«بخلاف الوطء في العتق المبهم عند أبي حنيفة»
“Intercourse in a case of unspecified emancipation is different according to Abu Hanifa.”
Suppose one of two enslaved women was declared free without specifying which. Subsequent relations with one woman do not necessarily prove that she was the one remaining enslaved, because lawful relations can, depending on the legal facts, be explained through ownership or marriage.
In the irrevocable-divorce case an action might identify a continuing marriage; here the same action admits more than one legal explanation. Alternative legal grounds weaken the alleged necessary implication.
Clarification by necessity requires a conclusion that truly follows, not merely one possible reconstruction of events.