“Zayd” exemplifies a specified individual.
“Rajul” exemplifies a determined type in this classification.
“Muslimūn” shows plurality through verbal form.
“Man” can produce semantic generality in suitable constructions.
To analyze a legal expression, first determine its assigned meaning and use, then whether it specifies a referent or encompasses a plurality. Lexical ambiguity and contextual qualifications, where present, require separate examination.
The authority of clear specific wording is one topic; the reach and possible qualification of general wording is another. Sound inference keeps them distinct.