The analysis of human acts employs revealed evidence and rational argument without treating them as interchangeable. Scriptural formulations such as “God is the Creator of everything” address the universality of creation, while rational argument examines whether a contingent human act could be independently originated by a creature.
If an objection concerns the grammar of a verse, the reply needs syntactic and contextual analysis. If it concerns the claim that an originator must know all particulars, the reply must examine general versus detailed knowledge.
A sound inquiry identifies exactly which premise is contested and answers at that level. Repeating a different proof is not, by itself, an answer to every objection.