An objection notes that someone may possess knowledge but fail to attend to it at a given moment. Classical argument therefore distinguishes ignorance (jahl) from inattention (dhuhūl). In the first case, the relevant knowledge is absent; in the second, something known is not presently attended to.
Someone who walks may understand many principles of movement without identifying every particular motion or pause. Human volition need not coincide with exhaustive awareness of all components.
The distinction neither removes human choice nor denies divine creation. It clarifies that an agent's voluntary relation to an act is not the same as the claim to originate it independently and comprehensively.