Scenario: A person has the health, time and ordinary means to pray but insists that no duty can apply until he experiences a special inner enabling feeling.
Governing principle: Ordinary capacity—health, opportunity and available means—is relevant to the obligation, while divine enabling assistance accompanying the act is distinguished from it.
Sound application: A person with the ordinary capacity required for duty cannot simply cite the absence of a felt inner state to abandon it.
Limit of the conclusion: Divine enabling assistance is not treated as an independent possession of the human agent.