LessonsProof of Mutual Hindrance: Divine Unity, Conflicting Wills and Eternity of AttributesQuiz

فإن القول بتعدد الواجب لذاته مناف للتوحيد
For affirming several beings necessary in themselves is incompatible with divine unity.

Part of the debate concerns whether attributes are called necessary or contingent. If “necessary” were taken to mean another independent deity, the objection from plurality would follow. If attributes were put without qualification among ordinary contingents, a question of origination would arise, whereas the classical Sunni doctrine affirms eternal divine attributes.

One must first identify the subject of a predicate: does “necessary” refer to an independent essence, or to an inseparable divine perfection considered under a different conceptual aspect? Many objections depend on precisely this ambiguity.

Opening interactive controls...

Are divine attributes necessary or contingent?

Proof of Mutual Hindrance: Divine Unity, Conflicting Wills and Eternity of Attributes

فإن القول بتعدد الواجب لذاته مناف للتوحيد
For affirming several beings necessary in themselves is incompatible with divine unity.

Part of the debate concerns whether attributes are called necessary or contingent. If “necessary” were taken to mean another independent deity, the objection from plurality would follow. If attributes were put without qualification among ordinary contingents, a question of origination would arise, whereas the classical Sunni doctrine affirms eternal divine attributes.

One must first identify the subject of a predicate: does “necessary” refer to an independent essence, or to an inseparable divine perfection considered under a different conceptual aspect? Many objections depend on precisely this ambiguity.