LessonsWiping Over Khuffs and the Continuing Rulings of Hajj and JihadQuiz

First case: The ruling concerning Hajj remains established, but an unforeseen calamity prevents its performance in a given year. That circumstance does not abolish the Hajj ruling.
Second case: The ruling concerning jihad remains established, but no fighting occurs during a particular period. Non-occurrence does not repeal the underlying ruling.

Conclusion: A religious duty's continuing legal status and its actual performance at a particular time are separate matters. This distinction explains the persistence described in the passage.

Opening interactive controls...

The status of a duty versus its occurrence

Wiping Over Khuffs and the Continuing Rulings of Hajj and Jihad

First case: The ruling concerning Hajj remains established, but an unforeseen calamity prevents its performance in a given year. That circumstance does not abolish the Hajj ruling.
Second case: The ruling concerning jihad remains established, but no fighting occurs during a particular period. Non-occurrence does not repeal the underlying ruling.

Conclusion: A religious duty's continuing legal status and its actual performance at a particular time are separate matters. This distinction explains the persistence described in the passage.