The Raḥbiyyah Maqāmah — An Accusation, an Unusual Oath and a Hundred-Mithqāl Offer

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• Where does al-Ḥārith travel in the tenth maqāmah?
• What device appears in “dāʿī al-shawq”?
• In “muntaḍiyan ʿazmah,” resolve evokes what?
• What does “alqaytu bihā al-marāsī” mean in context?
• Where does the narrator encounter the youth?
• What does “afraʿ” describe?
• What does the elder accuse the youth of?
• What is the youth’s initial position?
• What image is used by “mutaṭāyir al-sharār”?
• To whom do the disputants take the case?
• What does the allusion to al-Sulayk illustrate?
• What is meant by “jaddada al-shaykh daʿwāhu”?
• What influences the governor’s conduct?
• What does “afīkat affāk” convey?
• What does the governor initially ask the elder to provide?
• What is the grammatical number of “ʿadlān”?
• Why does the elder say he has no witnesses?
• Who proposes the unusual wording of the oath?
• What pair is named in “zayyana al-jibāha bi-l-ṭurar”?
• Which feature is described by “al-ḥawar”?
• Which contrast between balaj and falaj is correct?
• What does “sahwan wa-lā ʿamdan” deny?
• What is a “ghimd” in the sword metaphor?
• What reversal is shown by “badrī bi-l-miḥāq”?
• Why does the youth refuse the demanded oath?
• How many mithqāls does the governor propose for settlement?
• The elder’s accusation is immediately established by eyewitnesses.
• “Balaj” and “falaj” sound similar but refer to different things.
• The youth says he would accept shackles rather than this invented oath.
• By the end of Level 040, the governor has fully paid the hundred mithqāls.