Classifications of Tashbih: Terms, Multiplicity, Ground and Particle

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

What determines whether a term is simple or composite?
What is the ground of “this thing is like musk in fragrance”?
How are the two terms structured in the dust-and-stars comparison?
What is the terms-based class of the shaqīq flower imagery?
What class applies when a flower-strewn sunlit day is likened to moonlit night?
Which pattern groups moist/dry hearts before their models jujubes/dates?
Which model corresponds to the dry heart in the malfuf example?
What pattern does “fragrance is musk, faces are dinars…” illustrate?
What primarily distinguishes malfuf from mafruq?
How many subjects and models are in “the side-lock and my condition are like nights”?
What is it called when teeth are compared with pearls, hail and flowers?
How does taswiyah differ from jamʿ?
What is the defining feature of tamthil?
Why can the battle scene be both composite–composite and tamthil?
What ground-based type applies to a star likened to a coin for roundness?
Why is “the face is like the moon in radiance” mufassal?
Is the ground stated in “grammar is like salt in food”?
How is “he is a sea in generosity” classified?
What two labels apply to “he is like a sea in generosity”?
Why is “the scholar is light” a baligh simile?
Is every muʾakkad simile also baligh?
What strengthens the comparisons in “gold of sunset upon silver of water”?
Which classification fits “the face is like the moon in radiance”?
Are malfuf and mujmal incompatible labels?
A simple comparative term need not be expressed by only one word.
In malfuf, each subject is immediately followed by its model.
In jamʿ, a single subject may be compared with multiple models.
Tamthil is determined solely by how many words describe each term.
“He is a sea in generosity” is both muʾakkad and mufassal.
In tashbih baligh, both the particle and the explicit ground are absent.