ʿIlm al-Badīʿ: Semantic Embellishments, Part I
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- What must precede ornamental enhancement in badīʿ?
- What primarily distinguishes semantic from verbal embellishments?
- What makes «أيقاظًا وهم رقود» a case of ṭibāq?
- Why is «يحيي ويميت» ṭibāq between verbs?
- What is the key contrast in «لها ما كسبت وعليها ما اكتسبت»?
- What is distinctive in «ميتًا فأحييناه» as ṭibāq?
- Which structure clearly illustrates negative ṭibāq?
- When does a color contrast contribute to tadbīj?
- Why is «على الترتيب» essential in muqābalah?
- How are the two contrasts organized in the verse?
- Which figure dominates the opposed sequences of giving/piety/affirmation and withholding/self-sufficiency/denial?
- A passage has two contrasts but no organized matching sequence. What is the sound caution?
- Why is “sun and moon” murāʿāt al-naẓīr?
- Which question most reliably distinguishes ṭibāq from murāʿāt al-naẓīr?
- How does the ending «اللطيف الخبير» exemplify tashābuh al-aṭrāf?
- What produces anticipation of the ending in irṣād?
- Why is «اطبخوا لي جبة وقميصا» mushākalah?
- What must be maintained in analyzing «تعلم ما في نفسي ولا أعلم ما في نفسك»?
- What can supply the companion wording in implied mushākalah?
- What does the parallel «lajja» achieve in the muzāwajah example?
- What figure appears in «عادات السادات سادات العادات»?
- What is reversed in «يخرج الحي من الميت ويخرج الميت من الحي»?
- What separates rujūʿ from an accidental contradiction?
- What is the rhetorical work of «balā» in the deserted-homes line?
- What is the characteristic arrangement in tawriyah?
- Why does a word with two meanings not automatically create tawriyah?
- How does istikhdām work in the rain-and-grazing line?
- What distinguishes mushākalah from istikhdām?
- What does the laff in laff wa-nashr signify?
- How are the elements paired in the night-and-day example?
- Which pairing is correct in the dune-branch-gazelle example?
- Why are the owners of later attributes not individually restated in laff wa-nashr?
- Which distinction among affinity, ending correspondence, and anticipation is correct?
- Which reading best explains the rhetorical contrast of severity and compassion?
- How should affirmative and negative ṭibāq be distinguished?
- Any single pair of opposites is always sufficient for muqābalah.
- Murāʿāt al-naẓīr groups related concepts without requiring opposition.
- In mushākalah, repeated wording must always mean exactly the same thing.
- In unordered laff wa-nashr, semantic clues can identify the correct pairings.