Knowing that a word has two lexical or customary meanings does not make every occurrence tawriyah. The setting must permit an initial near reading and support the speaker’s intended remote reading.
Some religious expressions are discussed as possible rhetorical examples in classical treatments, but matters of divine attributes or doctrine are not settled merely by assigning a badīʿ label. The present analysis concerns lexical possibilities and contextual clues.
Literal or figurative usage, mushākalah, and tawriyah are distinct questions; multiple possible readings do not by themselves establish all three.