Clarity of indication is comparative. One expression may be awḍaḥ, clearer, while another is relatively khafī, less evident, with respect to the same intended meaning.
The less explicit expression need not be incomprehensible or meaningless. It may be understood after the listener supplies a customary connection, contextual clue, or intermediate inference.
For instance, “Zayd is very hospitable” communicates hospitality directly. “There are always guests at Zayd's house” points to the same quality by way of a familiar social association. The difference lies in the mental route by which the listener arrives at hospitality.