Even when two clauses speak about the same individual or display lexical similarity, the case for waṣl is not automatically complete. The second clause might be emphasis, explanation or an answer to an implied question, for which faṣl remains preferable.
Alongside a shared relation we must consider independent predications and the absence of an obstacle to conjunction. Identity of reference alone cannot override the earlier principles of separation.
Opening interactive controls...
Refining the Jāmiʿ and the Conditions of Elegant Coordination
Even when two clauses speak about the same individual or display lexical similarity, the case for waṣl is not automatically complete. The second clause might be emphasis, explanation or an answer to an implied question, for which faṣl remains preferable.
Alongside a shared relation we must consider independent predications and the absence of an obstacle to conjunction. Identity of reference alone cannot override the earlier principles of separation.