Two people each owe Rs 100,000, but the sources differ:
Case 1 — a loan has become due and the borrower claims no assets.
Case 2 — compensation for destroyed property has become due and the liable person claims no assets.
In Case 1, prior receipt of value is established. In Case 2, owing compensation does not prove available wealth. Quduri therefore applies different initial evidentiary and detention rules.
Opening interactive controls...
Contrasting loan and damage compensation
Kitab al-Hajr: Claimed Insolvency, Detention and Release
Two people each owe Rs 100,000, but the sources differ:
Case 1 — a loan has become due and the borrower claims no assets.
Case 2 — compensation for destroyed property has become due and the liable person claims no assets.
In Case 1, prior receipt of value is established. In Case 2, owing compensation does not prove available wealth. Quduri therefore applies different initial evidentiary and detention rules.