*Fath al-Qadir* records an intra-Hanafi disagreement: Abu Hanifa and Abu Yusuf uphold the dinar and qafiz examples, whereas Imam Muhammad disputes their validity.
His reasoning is that a genuine exception removes something encompassed by the original wording, while dinars and wheat are not literally included in the word dirhams. The other two jurists recognize a constructive or functional affinity through their monetary role. It would be inaccurate to present this cross-kind rule as unanimous among all three.
Opening interactive controls...
Imam Muhammad’s disagreement
Kitab al-Iqrar: Connected Exceptions, Quantities, and Cross-Category Exceptions
*Fath al-Qadir* records an intra-Hanafi disagreement: Abu Hanifa and Abu Yusuf uphold the dinar and qafiz examples, whereas Imam Muhammad disputes their validity.
His reasoning is that a genuine exception removes something encompassed by the original wording, while dinars and wheat are not literally included in the word dirhams. The other two jurists recognize a constructive or functional affinity through their monetary role. It would be inaccurate to present this cross-kind rule as unanimous among all three.