Causes of Diptote Status — ʿAdl and Waṣf

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• How does the book define ʿadl?
• What does «تَحْقِيقًا أَوْ تَقْدِيرًا» mean?
• With what does ʿadl not combine, according to the book?
• Which pair of causes does the book assign to «عُمَر»?
• What does «زُفَر» illustrate in the text?
• What is the case of «عُمَرَ» in «مَرَرْتُ بِعُمَرَ»?
• What is «عُمَرُ» in «جَاءَ عُمَرُ»?
• What distinguishes «زَيْدٌ» from «عُمَرُ» in this lesson?
• Under which pair are «ثُلَاث، مَثْلَث، أُخَر، جُمَع» listed?
• What does «ثُلَاثَ» express?
• How is «ثُلَاثَ» parsed in «دَخَلَ الطُّلَّابُ ثُلَاثَ»?
• How is «أُخَرَ» parsed in «مِنْ أَيَّامٍ أُخَرَ»?
• What governs «أَيَّامٍ» in «مِنْ أَيَّامٍ أُخَرَ»?
• Why can a genitive adjective visibly take fatḥa?
• What is the book’s condition for effective waṣf?
• What does the book say about combining waṣf and proper-name status?
• Which pair explains the diptote «أَسْوَد» here?
• Why is «أَسْوَدَ» genitive in the sentence?
• Even if aswad/arqam become snake names, what does the book still consider?
• What marks the genitive of «أَرْبَعٍ» in the book’s example?
• Why does the book classify «أَرْبَعٍ» as munṣarif here?
• What should you do before classifying a word with visible fatḥa?
• What principle is illustrated by «زَيْدٌ»?
• Which pair with ʿadl is supported by the book?
• What do these two phrases have in common?
• According to the book, ʿUmar combines ʿadl with proper-name status.
• In «مِنْ أَيَّامٍ أُخَرَ», ukhar is accusative simply because it has fatḥa.
• Any current descriptive use suffices for an effective waṣf cause; the original meaning is irrelevant.
• The book treats «أَرْبَعٍ» in «بِنِسْوَةٍ أَرْبَعٍ» as fully declinable.
• The book allows ʿadl and the verb-pattern cause together as the pair of causes.
• Tanwīn on «زَيْدٌ» means it must be indefinite.