Ism Inna and the Noun Governed by Lā of Generic Negation
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- What is Zaydan in «إِنَّ زَيْدًا قَائِمٌ»?
- What case is the predicate in this sentence?
- Why does al-ṭālib change to accusative after inna?
- What is the central meaning of lā of generic negation?
- What is ghulāma in «لَا غُلَامَ رَجُلٍ»?
- What is rajulin in this construction?
- What supplies the predicate in this sentence?
- What marks the accusative on ʿishrīna?
- What is dirhaman after ʿishrīna?
- How do the dependent nouns differ in these examples?
- How should rajula in «لَا رَجُلَ» be parsed?
- Why is al-dāri genitive?
- Why is rajula called mufrad in this rule?
- Why does the special lā-governance fail with a definite noun?
- What is Zaydun in this source example?
- Why does the book repeat lā in the definite-noun pattern?
- Why is rajulun nominative here?
- What is the role of fī l-dāri?
- Which example shows a single noun of working lā built on fatḥ?
- Why is it wrong to call ghulāma indeclinable here?
- Which type includes ʿishrīna dirhaman?
- How many grammatical readings does the book list?
- Which pair is illustrated by lā ḥawla wa lā quwwatan?
- What is the case pattern in lā ḥawlun wa lā quwwata?
- What is the case of both nouns in this reading?
- What is the case pattern in this form?
- How is quwwata analysed in the both-fatḥ reading?
- What does the source supply as omitted in lā ʿalayka?
- What makes omission of the noun of lā acceptable here?
- What is ʿalayka in the understood full form?
- What is the key parsing distinction?
- Which sentence has a nominative due to intervening material?
- Which sentence loses the special governance because its noun is definite?
- Why is dirhaman accusative here?
- How do the nouns of lā differ in these two expressions?
- What case does ʿAmrun have here?
- Which is the source’s explicit case of an omitted lā-noun?
- What happens when a phrase separates lā from its indefinite noun?
- What is the next chapter after these source sections?
- Qāʾimun is a nominative khabar of inna.
- Rajulin is accusative tamyīz in lā ghulāma rajulin.
- ʿIshrīna in this construction is accusative with yāʾ.
- A construct noun of generic lā must always be parsed as built on fatḥ.
- Rajula in lā rajula is built on fatḥ in the accusative position.
- In lā Zaydun ... the definite name prevents the special governing construction.
- Intervening fī l-dāri blocks the special generic-lā governance.
- The book lists only two patterns for lā ḥawla wa lā quwwata.
- In lā ʿalayka, the noun of lā is omitted based on context.
- Both nouns have the same grammatical form in lā ḥawla wa lā quwwatan.