The Predicate of Mā and Lā Resembling Laysa

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• What is the grammatical case of qāʾiman in «مَا زَيْدٌ قَائِمًا»?
• What is Zaydun in «مَا زَيْدٌ قَائِمًا»?
• What is ḥāḍiran in the source example «لَا رَجُلٌ حَاضِرًا»?
• In «لَا رَجُلٌ حَاضِرًا», what case is rajulun?
• What happens to mā’s governance when the predicate follows illā?
• In «مَا زَيْدٌ إِلَّا قَائِمٌ», what is qāʾimun?
• What does illā do in this construction?
• How is qāʾimun parsed in «مَا قَائِمٌ زَيْدٌ»?
• What is Zaydun in «مَا قَائِمٌ زَيْدٌ»?
• Which source construction prevents mā’s governance through predicate fronting?
• What is in in «مَا إِنْ زَيْدٌ قَائِمٌ»?
• What case is qāʾimun in mā in Zaydun qāʾimun?
• Which is NOT one of the book’s three causes for cancelled governance?
• To which classical usage does the source attribute governance by mā and lā?
• What does the source say of Banū Tamīm?
• In Tamimi mā Zaydun qāʾimun, how is qāʾimun parsed?
• What distinguishes these two lā constructions?
• What is ḥarāmun in the cited verse?
• How is qatlu analyzed in the verse?
• What is the case of al-muḥibbi in the cited verse?
• Why is the predicate accusative in «مَا زَيْدٌ قَائِمًا»?
• What is al-ṭālibu in the supplementary example?
• Why is mujtahidun nominative with illā?
• What is al-ṭālibu after fronted mujtahidun?
• Which example has added in after mā?
• Which compares the nouns of mā resembling laysa and inna correctly?
• Which predicate form belongs after illā here?
• What does mā do in the Tamimi analysis of mā Zaydun qāʾimun?
• In which lā construction is rajula built on fatḥ?
• Which question best guides the case analysis of khabar?
• In which example is mā still governing an accusative predicate?
• In governing mā Zaydun qāʾiman, the noun is nominative and predicate accusative.
• Qāʾimun after illā is an accusative exception.
• The source retains mā’s governance when the predicate is fronted.
• Added in is the same as governing inna.
• The book attributes this governing construction to Hijazi usage.
• The source says neither mā nor lā governs in Tamimi usage.
• Al-muḥibbi in the cited verse is genitive in iḍāfa.
• The two lā sentences have the same case analysis.
• Mā Zaydun qāʾimun illustrates nominative khabar under Tamimi non-governing mā.
• In all three examples where mā stops governing, the predicate is accusative.