إِلَّا أَنَّ الْبَوْنَ بَيْنَهُمَا وَبَيْنَ هَذَيْنِ بَعِيدٌ فِي كَمَالِ الْفَضْلِ وَصِحَّةِ النَّقْلِ وَإِنْ كَانَ عَوْفٌ وَأَشْعَثُ غَيْرَ مَدْفُوعَيْنِ عَنْ صِدْقٍ وَأَمَانَةٍ عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ وَلَكِنَّ الْحَالَ مَا وَصَفْنَا مِنَ الْمَنْزِلَةِ عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ
Translation: There is a substantial difference between the pairs in excellence and sound transmission, even though scholars do not deny ʿAwf and Ashʿath truthfulness and trustworthiness. The difference concerns rank, not a charge of lying.
“Not denied truthfulness and trustworthiness” is an essential qualification. Lower precision does not mean fabrication or dishonesty; a critic may prefer one route while still affirming the narrator’s integrity.