The text also discusses the relation between “ʿamā” (blindness) and “baṣar” (sight). Understanding blindness invokes the capacity for sight and its absence; it does not assert that every blind person actually has sight.
Compare:
“Four” → even: a necessary numerical property.
“Book” → my cupboard: a personal association, not a necessary implication.
Iltizām requires a relation of necessity, not any idea that happens to come to mind.