The report concerning an unmarried offender mentions one hundred lashes and exile for a year. The juristic question is whether exile is an indispensable component of the Quranically stated penalty.
In the Hanafi argument, turning that additional report into an unavoidable part of the prescribed hadd would qualify the verse. Exile may instead be understood as an administrative or discretionary measure in relevant circumstances. The familiar Shafiʿi position treats exile as part of the applicable punishment. The example illustrates differing theories of added conditions.