فالمركب: ما اجتمع عليه الآراء على حكم الحادثة مع وجود الاختلاف في العلة.
Composite consensus occurs when views agree upon the ruling of a case but differ about its legal cause.
Imagine two jurists reaching the same result in a compound case. One relies on cause A; the other on cause B. Their practical conclusions coincide, but they are not relying on one unanimously accepted rationale.
The significance appears when the evidence for one of those causes is challenged.
In a non-composite agreement, the jurists share a legal basis rather than reaching one result through separate contingent causes.