Direct wording: “For the poor emigrants” establishes their entitlement as the discourse’s stated purpose.
Ishārah: describing those very recipients as “poor” is treated as additionally bearing on the question of their former property rights.
Both conclusions relate to the same text, but their justificatory routes differ. We must ask not merely what follows, but whether the text was directed to establishing that result.
Recognizing the route matters when competing indications have to be evaluated.