كقوله: أنت طالق، يفيد الحكم من غير حاجة إلى النية.
For example, “You are divorced” indicates the relevant legal effect without the need for a separate intention to divorce.
The book uses this as a classical example of explicit divorce wording. It illustrates that an unambiguous formula is not interpreted in the same way as an allusive one. The legal determination in an actual case can still depend on the complete utterance, the people involved, marital circumstances, and other applicable legal rules.