«مائة وثلاثة أثواب، أو مائة وثلاثة دراهم، أو مائة وثلاثة أعبد»
“One hundred and three garments; or one hundred and three dirhams; or one hundred and three enslaved persons.”
These expressions include the numeral three alongside a clearly named class. The construction permits the named class of the counted items to explain the earlier undifferentiated hundred.
Compare the first pattern, “one hundred and a dirham,” where a monetary measure identifies the prior unit, with “one hundred and three garments,” where the structure of counted items also becomes relevant.
This does not imply that every conjunction mechanically transfers the later object's category to the earlier number. The form of the conjunction, the number, the class of goods and the legal context must all be considered.