«بخلاف قوله: مائة وثوب، أو مائة وشاة، حيث لا يكون ذلك بيانًا للمائة»
“By contrast, ‘one hundred and a garment’ or ‘one hundred and a sheep’ does not, on the principal view here, clarify the hundred.”
A single garment or sheep does not play the same role in a general debt admission as an identified monetary or measurable item. Its conjunction therefore does not necessarily determine the category of the earlier hundred.
Abu Yusuf differs: he allows the conjunctive explanation to extend to these counted goods as well.
ExpressionTreatment
One hundred and a dirhamDirham explains the prior hundred
One hundred and a garmentNot necessarily explanatory on the principal view; Abu Yusuf differs
The difference should not be concealed by forcing both examples under one uniform interpretation.