LessonsModes of Clarification: Necessity, Circumstance, Conjunction and ReplacementQuiz

«فيجوز ذلك من صاحب الشرع، ولا يجوز ذلك من العباد»
“This is permissible for the Lawgiver, not for ordinary persons.”

«وَإِذَا بَدَّلْنَا آيَةً مَكَانَ آيَةٍ»
“When We replace one verse with another.”

Authority to abrogate divine law belongs to the Lawgiver. An individual cannot erase a completed admission or legally operative divorce merely by saying something later, as though exercising legislative abrogation.

The fact that two statements differ does not establish naskh. One must show an actual later authoritative termination of an earlier rule, with a sound chronological and interpretive relationship. If the evidence admits consistent application, a claim of abrogation requires additional proof.

Opening interactive controls...

Who can abrogate a legal ruling?

Modes of Clarification: Necessity, Circumstance, Conjunction and Replacement

«فيجوز ذلك من صاحب الشرع، ولا يجوز ذلك من العباد»
“This is permissible for the Lawgiver, not for ordinary persons.”

«وَإِذَا بَدَّلْنَا آيَةً مَكَانَ آيَةٍ»
“When We replace one verse with another.”

Authority to abrogate divine law belongs to the Lawgiver. An individual cannot erase a completed admission or legally operative divorce merely by saying something later, as though exercising legislative abrogation.

The fact that two statements differ does not establish naskh. One must show an actual later authoritative termination of an earlier rule, with a sound chronological and interpretive relationship. If the evidence admits consistent application, a claim of abrogation requires additional proof.