The text says that when the endpoint is a separately identifiable thing, ila does not, merely by itself, include that thing in the preceding ruling.
«اشتريت الأرض من هذا الحائط إلى هذا الحائط»
I purchased the land from this wall up to that wall.
The terminal wall is a distinct object. Naming it as a boundary identifies the extent of the land without necessarily transferring the wall itself. Naming a boundary and including the boundary object are separate issues.