Prescribed Acts and Prohibitions: Fard, Wajib, Sunnah, Nafl, Haram, Makruh, Azimah and Rukhsah
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- Which four types of prescribed acts does the author list?
- What is the decisive feature in the definition of fard?
- A person accepts a fard duty but neglects performing it. Which distinction matters?
- What does the non-conclusive element in the definition of wajib signify?
- Which prayers does the book cite as examples of wajib?
- What does “wajib is like fard in respect of action” mean?
- Which contrast between fard and wajib is accurate?
- What is central to the book’s definition of sunnah here?
- How does this definition of sunnah relate to its broader use in hadith studies?
- What is the difference between an excused occasional omission and habitual disregard of sunnah?
- Which statement correctly combines the meaning and ruling of nafl?
- Why can it be wrong to call something nafl merely because it is not fard?
- What are the three categories of manahi in the source?
- How do “decisive evidence” and “demand to refrain” combine to define haram?
- What distinguishes committing a haram act from denying its prohibition?
- In what fundamental respect does makruh tahrimi differ from haram?
- What is the practical ruling on makruh tahrimi in the book?
- Which is given as an example of makruh tahrimi in the source?
- Under what principle is water left by a cat discussed?
- Which form of makruh tanzihi is illustrated by water left by predatory birds?
- What consequence does the textbook attach to makruh tanzihi?
- What most clearly distinguishes tahrimi from tanzihi?
- What does azimah mean in the author’s discussion?
- What is the general technical meaning of rukhsah?
- What remains in a rukhsah where the original prohibition persists?
- What condition does the text state for the coercion example involving an outward utterance?
- What follows from the reward mentioned for steadfast endurance in the first concession?
- What is central to the second kind of concession described as permitted despite its ordinary cause?
- What does the author say about refusing permitted lifesaving sustenance in severe hunger until death?
- Which comparison correctly distinguishes the two concessions?