LessonsThe Mujtahid’s Duty: Evidence Hierarchy, Conflicts, and Revised IjtihadQuiz

وإن كان بين السنتين يميل إلى آثار الصحابة أو القياس الصحيح
If two Sunnah reports appear to conflict, the jurist considers reports of the Companions or sound analogy.

Before seeking a preference, the authenticity, wording, context and possible reconciliation of both reports are examined. Where chronology and the conditions of abrogation are established, that is a distinct route. A weak conjectural analogy is not being licensed to override a sound report.

The practice and statements of the Companions may illuminate the Prophetic intent, while valid analogy can supply a relevant juristic indication. Their role here is to resolve the difficult application of evidence, not to erase established Sunnah.

Opening interactive controls...

When two Sunnah reports appear to differ

The Mujtahid’s Duty: Evidence Hierarchy, Conflicts, and Revised Ijtihad

وإن كان بين السنتين يميل إلى آثار الصحابة أو القياس الصحيح
If two Sunnah reports appear to conflict, the jurist considers reports of the Companions or sound analogy.

Before seeking a preference, the authenticity, wording, context and possible reconciliation of both reports are examined. Where chronology and the conditions of abrogation are established, that is a distinct route. A weak conjectural analogy is not being licensed to override a sound report.

The practice and statements of the Companions may illuminate the Prophetic intent, while valid analogy can supply a relevant juristic indication. Their role here is to resolve the difficult application of evidence, not to erase established Sunnah.