An objection arises from an indivisible atom: it may be described as occupying a region without meeting every requirement that some definitions of place impose upon a larger body. How, then, do occupation and location relate?
The reply distinguishes technical usage: some definitions make spatial occupation broader than place, so one can be conceived without the other in a specified sense.
This does not establish spatial occupation for God. The atom itself belongs to discussion of creaturely body and region; the necessary being is excluded from those physical limitations and relations.