“Zayd is a lion” omits both particle and respect, and can exemplify a strong form of rhetorical identification. Other classifications ask whether it is familiar or remote, effective or defective, and what contextual cue determines its meaning.
Emphatic / mursal tracks particle omission or presence.
Condensed / detailed tracks whether the respect is expressed.
Intensity evaluates their combined rhetorical effect.
Acceptable / unacceptable asks whether the intended purpose succeeds.
A single expression can thus be emphatic, condensed, and rhetorically acceptable without contradiction: each label answers a different question.