Begin an analysis by identifying the subject and model from wording and context. Next determine whether the respect is expressed. Then establish whether the comparison particle is present.
Only then explain whether omission of the respect broadens the apparent scope, whether omission of the particle strengthens direct predication, and whether the statement achieves its purpose. This supplies rhetorical reasoning rather than a list of labels.
For “Zayd is a lion in courage,” “emphatic and detailed” is not enough. A complete analysis adds that Zayd is presented in the lion's identity while the resemblance remains restricted to bravery.