Parts of an utterance may be explicit while other relations within it remain allusive. In “generosity and honour are in a tent...,” the qualities are named, but their attribution to the tent’s occupant is indirect.
Simply observing that an attribute is mentioned is insufficient. Ask separately: What is expressed directly? and Which relation is inferred?
This distinction resolves many difficult borderline cases.
Opening interactive controls...
Three Types of Kināyah: Referent, Attribute, and Attribution
Parts of an utterance may be explicit while other relations within it remain allusive. In “generosity and honour are in a tent...,” the qualities are named, but their attribution to the tent’s occupant is indirect.
Simply observing that an attribute is mentioned is insufficient. Ask separately: What is expressed directly? and Which relation is inferred?
This distinction resolves many difficult borderline cases.