Kitab al-Iqrar: Capacity, Unspecified Rights, and Amounts in Admissions
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- What fundamentally distinguishes an acknowledgment from a sale?
- In “I owe Zayd 40 dirhams,” who is the muqirr?
- Which is the correct meaning of muqarr bihi?
- Which capacity is specified in al-Quduri’s opening rule for an ordinary financial admission?
- Why is a young child’s debt admission not treated like that of a competent adult?
- How does coercion affect an acknowledgment according to the commentary in Fath al-Qadir?
- Which accurately applies the concept of hujjah qasirah?
- If someone admits owing Khalid an unspecified right, what is the initial rule?
- Who bears the initial duty to clarify an unspecified acknowledgment?
- What does “fa-in lam yubayyin ajbarahu al-qadi ʿala al-bayan” mean?
- Which explanation can in principle satisfy “lahu ʿalayya shayʾ”?
- The admitting party specifies 2 books; the beneficiary demands 5 without further proof. Whose account can be accepted?
- Does a smaller clarification necessarily defeat independent valid proof for a larger claim?
- Under al-Quduri, who initially interprets the expression “mal”?
- Which best explains the distinction between mal and shayʾ?
- What extra qualification does al-Ikhtiyar mention for “lahu ʿalayya mal”?
- What is the minimum for “lahu ʿalayya mal ʿazim” in al-Quduri?
- Someone admits “great property” and then specifies 80 dirhams. What follows under the stated rule?
- What is the minimum for an unspecified acknowledgment of “dirhams”?
- If the speaker first says “dirhams” and then specifies 7, what follows?
- What is the minimum for “many dirhams”?
- Why is a later specification of 9 insufficient after “many dirhams”?
- What is the correct pair of minimums for “great property” and “many dirhams”?
- What does al-Ikhtiyar state for the basic expression “kadha dirhaman”?
- What is the minimum for “kadha kadha dirhaman” in al-Quduri?
- What minimum follows “kadha wa-kadha dirhaman”?
- What linguistic feature accounts for the difference between kadha kadha and kadha wa-kadha?
- Why would assigning 11 to “kadha wa-kadha dirhaman” be incorrect?
- A judge assumes “mal ʿazim” always equals a fixed amount of modern local currency. What is the problem?
- Someone admits Khalid has a right but leaves its nature unspecified. What is the next proper step?
- Which statement adds an adjective of abundance to a plural admission?
- A speaker identifies the beneficiary but leaves the amount of the acknowledged right unspecified. Which statement is correct?
- Which correctly separates independent proof from a mere explanation of an admission?
- If a speaker explains “I owe something” by identifying an entirely valueless item, what is the problem?
- How do identifying the beneficiary and identifying the subject differ?
- Which is the best overall summary?