Diptote Causes — Ultimate Broken-Plural Patterns

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• According to the text, when does a plural itself cause diptote status?
• How many letters follow the plural alif in «مَسَاجِد»?
• Which shape does the book illustrate with «دَوَابّ»?
• Which three letters follow the alif in «مَصَابِيح»?
• Which word does the book expressly treat as fully declinable because it accepts final hāʾ?
• What does the author mean by «standing in place of two causes»?
• What is the case of «مَسَاجِدَ» in «مَرَرْتُ بِمَسَاجِدَ»?
• What is the role of «مَسَاجِدُ» in «هَذِهِ مَسَاجِدُ»?
• Why is «مَسَاجِدَ» marked with fatḥa in «رَأَيْتُ مَسَاجِدَ»?
• Why does «الْمَسَاجِدِ» take kasra after بِـ?
• Why does «مَسَاجِدِ» take kasra in «بِمَسَاجِدِ الْمَدِينَةِ»?
• Which is the correct comparison between «كُتُبٌ» and «مَسَاجِدُ»?
• Which is the correct nominative ending for «دَوَابّ»?
• What is the case of maṣābīḥ in «إِلَى مَصَابِيحَ»?
• Why does the book say ṣayāqilah and farāzinah are fully declinable?
• What is the correct final marking in «بِصَيَاقِلَةٍ»?
• Which special condition is relevant to the three-letter shape in «مَصَابِيح»?
• What is the grammatical force of kāf in the book’s example «كَمَسَاجِدَ»?
• Which source example has one doubled letter after its plural alif?
• Which distinction between «مُسْلِمِينَ» and «مَسَاجِدَ» is correct?
• What is the accusative marker in «رَأَيْتُ مُسْلِمَاتٍ»?
• Which diptote form correctly takes kasra in the genitive because of iḍāfa?
• What syntactic role does «مَصَابِيحُ» have in «هَذِهِ مَصَابِيحُ»?
• In which case is genitive fatḥa correct for «مَصَابِيح»?
• Which statement correctly fixes a mistaken analysis of «بِمَسَاجِدَ»?
• Which is the most reliable identification method for the book’s ultimate broken-plural patterns?
• What is being conveyed by «as though it were pluralized twice»?
• «مَسَاجِدُ» is nominative with ḍamma but without tanwīn.
• «بِالْمَسَاجِدَ» is the regular genitive form when al- is present.
• The author identifies ṣayāqilah and farāzinah as fully declinable.
• In «مَرَرْتُ بِمَسَاجِدَ», masājid is an accusative direct object.
• In «دَوَابّ», a doubled bāʾ follows the plural alif.
• Every broken plural must have an ultimate broken-plural pattern.
• In «مَصَابِيح», the middle of the three letters after alif is a sākin yāʾ.
• The kasra in «بِمَسَاجِدِ الْمَدِينَةِ» is incorrect because masājid is a diptote.