«حكمه: لو امتنع عن تناوله حتى قتل أو مات يكون آثماً؛ لامتناعه عن المباح»
The book states that if someone in this extreme necessity refuses the now-permitted means of survival until death results, the person is sinful for refusing what became permissible in those conditions.
This differs from the first type of concession. Here the priority is preservation of life, so accepting the lifesaving relaxation is not merely an inferior option.
The discussion concerns genuinely life-threatening circumstances. Any practical application must assess real danger, available lawful alternatives, proportionality and other relevant conditions.