Imaginative and Implicit Metaphor, Reinforcement, and Critiques of al-Sakkaki

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• What does the phrase “claws of death” not necessarily become merely because it has two words?
• When the expression about moving feet describes hesitation, what must be examined?
• What is the overtly named subject of comparison in “death sinks in its claws”?
• In the same expression, “claws” points toward a property of what?
• Why is “claws” called an explicit metaphor in one account attributed to al-Sakkaki?
• What is the clue in “the clue is attaching it to death”?
• Which distinction between clue and resemblance basis is correct?
• What lacks realization in certain definitions of imaginative metaphor?
• What is the central theoretical issue in positing an independent imagined form?
• What makes “the hand of the north wind” figurative?
• In the discussion of “attributing one thing to another,” what may be the focus?
• What is the usual role of source-associated features in reinforced metaphor?
• What can distinguish the claws of death from mere reinforcement?
• What does commercial exchange depict in the Qur’anic expression about purchasing error?
• How does “their trade made no profit” relate to the prior image?
• What is a useful structural difference between purchasing error and claws of death?
• What is meant by claimed membership of a rhetorical class?
• Which inference is false when death is rhetorically treated as a predator?
• What is the issue behind an objection about two kinds of predator?
• Why do differing descriptions of implicit and imaginative metaphor not necessarily contradict immediately?
• Which question is appropriate for identifying the clue in “claws of death”?
• What first step is necessary when analyzing implicit metaphor?
• How is the predator-image signaled although death remains overt?
• Why distinguish verbal metaphor from imaginative attribution?
• How should competing analyses of “claws of death” be compared?
• Why is it inadequate to translate wahm here simply as false belief?
• Which concise distinction best fits reinforcement and imaginative attribution?
• What may further lion-related details be in “I saw a lion preaching”?
• Why compare “hand of the wind” with “claws of death”?
• Which is the correct analytical order taught in this level?
• Adding complements to a word necessarily creates composite metaphor.
• The claws of death refer to anatomical organs literally possessed by death.
• In the discussed al-Sakkaki account, “claws” may be described as an explicit metaphor.
• Every rhetorical tradition defines imaginative metaphor and its relationship to implicit metaphor identically.
• The image of trade making no profit can strengthen the earlier commercial metaphor.
• Claimed membership of a rhetorical class necessarily alters conventional word meaning and biological reality.