Iṭnāb: Tadhyīl, Takmīl (Iḥtirās), and Tatmīm

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• What is essential to the definition of tadhyīl?
• What sort of addition does “taʿqīb al-jumlah bi-jumlah” require?
• How is tadhyīl distinct from word-for-word repetition?
• What does the interrogative form in Sabaʾ 34:17 principally achieve?
• If the recompense in the Sabaʾ example refers to the specified punishment, how is the clause understood?
• What best describes proverb-like tadhyīl?
• Which feature is characteristic of a context-bound, non-proverb-like appendix?
• What does “inna al-bāṭila kāna zahūqā” reinforce?
• What identifies reinforcement of the manṭūq?
• In taʾkīd al-mafhūm, what is reinforced?
• Why are the two classifications of tadhyīl distinct?
• Which distinction between tadhyīl and īghāl is sound?
• Why does the presence of inna not by itself prove tadhyīl?
• What is the principal work of takmīl / iḥtirās?
• What is the role of “ghayra mufsidihā” in the rain-prayer example?
• Why is “aʿizzatin ʿalā al-kāfirīn” important after “adhillatin ʿalā al-muʾminīn” (5:54)?
• Why are the two descriptions not a genuine contradiction?
• What must be checked before classifying an added qualification as iḥtirās?
• What chiefly distinguishes iḥtirās from tadhyīl?
• What distinction does “lā yūhimu khilāf al-maqṣūd” make in tatmīm?
• What does faḍlah signify in the definition of tatmīm?
• What does “ʿalā ḥubbihī” add to the report of feeding others?
• If the pronoun in “ʿalā ḥubbihī” refers to food, what is especially emphasized?
• If “ʿalā ḥubbihī” is read as love of God, what becomes prominent?
• What is common to both interpretations of “ʿalā ḥubbihī”?
• Which device fits a useful qualification added to speech that already avoids a misleading implication?
• A speaker says, “May rain fall, but not cause damage.” What best describes the addition?
• A clause states “Falsehood vanished” and is followed by “Falsehood does not endure by nature.” What is the relation?
• The main proposition is complete and “willingly” adds useful manner without correcting a misreading. Which analysis fits best?
• Which ordering correctly matches the three rhetorical functions?