Kitab al-Rahn: Salam, Sarf, Third-party Custody and Fungible Collateral

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• What may secure the obligation to pay salam capital?
• Why is merely delivering collateral not payment of salam capital?
• What is muslam fīh in salam?
• Who typically pledges security against delivery of the muslam fīh?
• What condition remains in sarf even if collateral is valid?
• If valid sarf collateral perishes in the session, what can make a claim constructively satisfied?
• If the owed countervalue is 40,000 and secured collateral value is 25,000, what follows after loss?
• If salam-price collateral remains intact, nothing is paid, and the session ends, what happens?
• Which salam obligation is inherently due at the specified future date?
• What is Zufar’s central objection to collateral securing these special obligations?
• Who is the ʿadl in this pledge context?
• Must valid collateral always be held in the creditor’s own hands?
• Why are the custodian’s duties concerning the asset and the secured value distinguished?
• May the pledgor alone retrieve collateral held by their agreed custodian?
• May the pledgee unilaterally remove the asset from the mutually agreed custodian?
• Collateral valued at 70,000 securing a 100,000 debt perishes in neutral custody; how much debt remains under the general rule?
• Does appointment as custodian alone confer authority to sell the collateral?
• Which goods does al-Quduri explicitly allow as collateral here?
• When same-kind pledged dirhams perish, what determines the setoff?
• A 100-dirham debt is secured by 60 same-kind dirhams that perish. How much remains?
• How does superior workmanship affect same-kind setoff after pledged dirhams perish?
• What is the normal basis for loss of a watch securing a debt of 100 dirhams?
• What does zuyūf signify in this classical dispute?
• What crucial additional fact appears in the debased-coin case?
• What is Abu Hanifah’s view after the debased dirhams have been spent unknowingly?
• What is the position of Abu Yusuf and Muhammad in the same debased-coin case?
• Why must the equivalent debased coins be returned under the disciples’ view?
• Why should loss in neutral custody not simply be treated as an ordinary deposit?
• Which statement correctly distinguishes the two salam obligations?
• Both parties appointed a custodian. Before payment, only the pledgee orders him to sell. What is the basic response?