Coordination (ʿAṭf bi-l-Ḥurūf): Rules and Parsing

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• Which relationship defines ʿaṭf al-nasaq?
• What is the coordinate in «قَامَ زَيْدٌ وَعَمْرٌو»?
• What is Zaydun’s function in that sentence?
• What is the final written wāw in ʿAmrun?
• What must intervene between coordinated terms?
• Why is Khālidan accusative in the sentence?
• Why is Bakrun nominative here?
• What is the case of ʿAmrin in this example?
• What is ʿālimun in «جَاءَ رَجُلٌ عَالِمٌ»?
• How is an-nahra analyzed in the teaching example?
• What does the text require with an attached nominative pronoun, without a separator?
• What is anā in the source example?
• What is Zaydun’s case in the example with anā?
• What serves as the separator in this source example?
• What changes when an intervening separator is present?
• Why is al-yawma accusative here?
• What is required for coordination with an attached genitive pronoun?
• What is the grammatical position of -ka?
• What governs the genitive of Zaydin?
• Which contrast does this sentence illustrate?
• What does “al-maʿṭūf fī ḥukm al-maʿṭūf ʿalayh” mean?
• How does the book’s replacement test work?
• What is ʿālimun coordinated with?
• Why is mujtahidun nominative here?
• What is musriʿan in the sentence?
• Where does coordination occur in the relative-clause example?
• What is the case of al-ḥujrati in the source example?
• What is the case of ʿAmrun in that construction?
• What view does the book attribute to al-Farrāʾ?
• What view is ascribed to Sībawayh on this construction?
• Under the first source position, when is two-governor coordination permitted?
• Why is the two-governor problem more complex?
• What should be identified first when parsing coordination?
• Which grammatical function explains Zaydun’s nominative?
• In ʿaṭf al-nasaq, only the coordinate is intended, not the first conjunct.
• In raʾaytu Zaydan wa-Khālidan, both named nouns are accusative.
• In ḍarabtu anā wa-Zaydun, anā reinforces the attached subject.
• In ḍarabtu al-yawma wa-Zaydun, al-yawma is not a separator.
• The text’s genitive-pronoun example repeats the preposition.
• If a coordinate follows an accusative ḥāl, it also follows the accusative case.
• The disagreement attributed to Sībawayh is a ban on every kind of coordination.
• Every wāw used between expressions must be wāw of accompaniment.