Particles Hatta, Ila and Ala: Scope, Limits and Legal Consequences

Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.

• What is the core function of hatta?
• Which condition supports the literal interpretation of hatta?
• What happens if someone separates before the debt is repaid under an oath not to separate until repayment?
• What sense can custom establish for a statement such as “until he dies”?
• If the first act cannot continue but the second can be its result, how may hatta function?
• Which relationship is central to “If I do not come so that you feed me”?
• Why must the actors and types of action be examined in hatta constructions?
• What is the basic meaning of ila?
• When ila expresses extension, what is the ordinary status of the endpoint?
• In purchasing an area “up to this wall,” what is the wall?
• What does night mark in “Complete the fast until night”?
• How is the endpoint treated when ila works by delimiting or excluding a scope?
• Under the Hanafi reading of “to the elbows,” are the elbows washed?
• What is the Hanafi treatment of the knee in the boundary of male awrah?
• Which meaning of ila is central to “You are divorced at the end of a month”?
• What issue does the reported view of Imam Zufar address in that divorce formula?
• What distinguishes the extension, exclusion, and deferral uses of ila?
• What is the main legal function of ala?
• What does “A thousand is owed by me to so-and-so” acknowledge?
• What matters in distinguishing “I have a thousand with me” from “I owe a thousand”?
• What interpretive question arises in a request for safe-conduct “for ten people of the fortress”?
• Which meaning of ala is relevant in “I sold you this for a thousand”?
• What does ala mean in “on condition that they associate nothing with God”?
• Why is the full amount not due according to Abu Hanifa’s analysis when only one of three requested divorces occurs?
• Which pair is correctly matched?
• How should the legal force of a particle be determined?
• Every event following hatta is necessarily a literal temporal endpoint of the previous act.
• Ila can sometimes postpone the occurrence of a legal effect until a stated time.
• “I owe a thousand” and “I hold a thousand” necessarily have identical legal implications.
• Ala may indicate consideration in one context and a condition in another.