Rational Figurative Predication: Relations and Contextual Indications
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- To what is an action ascribed in rational figurative predication?
- Why is rational figurative usage also called majāz ḥukmī?
- What does “al-fiʿl aw maʿnāhu” add to the definition?
- What relation explains “jarā al-nahr” (the river flowed)?
- What distinguishes rational figurative predication from lexical figurative usage?
- What is the role of a qarīnah ṣārifah?
- In “ʿīshah rāḍiyah,” who is literally content?
- What is notable about “sayl mufʿam”?
- In “shiʿr shāʿir,” what receives the poet’s quality?
- What is “jidd” in “jadda jidduhu”?
- What kind of association underlies “nahāruhu ṣāʾim”?
- What properly flows in “nahr jārin”?
- Why can building be attributed to a prince?
- Which construction is relevant in “aʿjabanī inbāt al-rabīʿ”?
- Is every factually mistaken predication automatically figurative?
- Why need “nimtu al-layla” not be figurative predication?
- Whose act is linked with “makr al-layl wa-l-nahār”?
- What association is prominent in the verse on recurring morning and evening?
- What should be identified first when analyzing rational figurative usage?
- Why is “kataba Zaydun” literal in an ordinary context?
- Which fact alone is insufficient to establish rational figurative predication?
- What does “mulābis” mean in this discussion?
- What changes between “ṣāma Zaydun nahāran” and “nahāruhu ṣāʾim”?
- What is the grammatical status of “ʿīshah rāḍiyah”?
- Why is “shiʿr shāʿir” rational figurative usage?
- What follows from figurative predication in genitive constructions?
- What association does “baynihimā” convey in the cited expression?
- What is the sound approach when no indication is established?
- Which group consists of the relations discussed?
- Why does the next discussion classify kinds of rational figurative predication?