Kitab al-Rahn: Two Pledgees, Conditional Security and Custody
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- Under Quduri, can one identified asset secure two separate creditors at the outset?
- What does attachment of security to the whole object establish?
- How does this arrangement differ from an independently pledged fractional share?
- For debts of 40,000 and 60,000, what is their proportional split?
- A joint pledge valued at 90,000 is lost under ordinary pledge liability against debts of 40,000 and 60,000. What is credited to the first?
- In the same ordinary-loss example, what is credited to the second debt?
- When the asset exceeds the combined debts, what is the status of the excess value on ordinary loss?
- If one pledgee is fully repaid but the other is not, what happens to the asset?
- After paying the first 40,000 creditor, how much remains due to the second creditor owed 60,000?
- Why must retention and debt satisfaction be distinguished?
- Which custody arrangement is consistent with the joint security rights?
- Does one jointly pledged asset make each creditor half owner?
- A named ornament pledged as a condition of sale protects which obligation?
- What does Quduri say if the buyer refuses to deliver the specified pledged item?
- When the collateral condition fails, what two options does the seller have?
- The buyer withholds collateral but immediately pays the full price. What follows?
- Why does equivalent replacement collateral change the seller’s remedy?
- In a sale with promised collateral, what does a refusal to pledge NOT extinguish?
- Why is the collateral clause in sale distinct from custodial arrangements?
- Who may safeguard collateral under the household-custody rule?
- What is the important qualification in the household rule?
- What is the stated effect if the pledgee deposits the collateral with an unauthorized outsider?
- Why is jointly authorized custody different from unilateral deposit by the pledgee?
- The pledgee uses a dependent child for ordinary safekeeping. Which statement follows the classical rule?
- Are unauthorized external deposit and the pledgee’s own misuse the same textual ruling?
- After one creditor is paid, retaining the whole pledge by the other concerns which right?
- Which fact can preserve the sale despite the originally promised pledge not being delivered?
- What is the sound sequence for analyzing one asset pledged for two loans?