Original and Dependent Metaphor: Generic Nouns, Verbs, Derivatives and Particles
Read-only question overview. Answers and scoring remain inside authenticated learner attempts.
- What chiefly determines whether metaphor is original or dependent?
- Why is “asad” for a brave person classed as original metaphor?
- What is the main rhetorical function of “yarmī” in “I saw a lion shooting”?
- What status allows a famous personal name such as “Ḥātim” to form an original metaphor?
- Which contrast matters between “qatl” as verbal noun and “qatala” as verb?
- What is normally analyzed first in a dependent metaphor involving a verb?
- Which set includes forms discussed under dependent metaphor?
- What semantic resemblance underlies “naṭaqat al-ḥāl”?
- What chiefly clues the figurative reading in “naṭaqat al-ḥāl”?
- Why is “naṭaqat al-ḥāl” analyzed as dependent rather than original metaphor?
- What should not be understood literally in “the situation spoke”?
- What is central when analyzing a metaphor involving a particle?
- Which relation helps explain “fī niʿmah”?
- How does the general notion of “containment” differ from a particular use of “fī”?
- What distinguishes two analyses of metaphor in particles?
- What makes the lām notable in the verse about Pharaoh’s household?
- Which two relations are likened in the lām of consequence?
- Why does “fa-ltaqaṭahu” matter to interpreting the lām?
- Is every consequence of an action its intended purpose?
- What do “naṭaqat al-ḥāl” and the lām of consequence share?
- Why is labeling a borrowed word merely a “noun” insufficient to prove an original metaphor?
- Which contrast correctly distinguishes jāmiʿ from qarīnah?
- If “Ḥātim arrived” truly refers to the person named Ḥātim, what follows?
- What principally supports analyzing “naṭaqat al-ḥāl” as metaphor rather than metonymy?
- Which sequence best supports a sound classification?
- Which statement correctly distinguishes purposive lām and lām of consequence?
- What should be checked when describing painful criticism as “wounding”?
- How are original/dependent and sensory/conceptual classifications related?
- Does the mere presence of the preposition “fī” prove a specific metaphor?
- Why does the original-metaphor category focus on generic nouns?
- Why must dependent metaphors in verbs, derivatives, and particles not all be analyzed identically?
- Both original and dependent metaphors still require resemblance and contextual indication.
- “Naṭaqat al-ḥāl” literally asserts that circumstances possess a human tongue.
- Any proper name automatically forms an original metaphor without a generic interpretation.
- A lām of consequence can frame an unintended outcome in the language of purpose.
- In particle metaphor, analyzing the related terms and relation is unnecessary.
- A verbal noun and derived verb from the same root must always belong to one metaphorical class.